patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Downers Grove Council to Revisit Commuter Parking Fee Increase

An alternative proposal by Commissioner Bob Barnett would raise annual revenue by $81,500, with non-residents seeing a more substantial fee increase than residents.

 

A week after tabling a discussion on raising commuter parking costs, the Downers Grove Council will consider an alternate proposal Tuesday that would further increase the disparity in fees for residents and non-residents, according to village documents.

The village council took up the issue of commuter parking permits at its Dec. 4 meeting as part of its 2012-13 budget implementation. That night, a proposal was submitted by village staff that would have increased quarterly fees at the Belmont Road, Main Street and Fairview Avenue train stations by anywhere from 6 percent to 25 percent.

Commissioner Bob Barnett requested the council delay any action on the item to allow consideration of an alternative plan. During a brief discussion of the staff's proposal, council members expressed concern about raising resident fees up to 25 percent, while non-residents would see an increase of just 9 percent.

Though specifics of Barnett's plan were not immediately released, the agenda for Tuesday's council meeting showed that Barnett's proposal would make the fees the same at all three stations—$90 for residents and $140 for non-residents. Based on current fees, non-residents would see a higher increase than residents, according to village documents.

Under the staff's proposal, the quarterly fee for residents would increase 25 percent at the Belmont and Main Street stations, and 6 percent at Fairview. For non-residents, the cost would increase 9 percent at Belmont and Main Street, and just under 5 percent at Fairview.

Under Barnett's proposal, the fee would increase 12 percent for residents and 27 percent for non-residents at both Belmont and Main Street. At Fairview, the fee would increase 20 percent for residents and 33 percent for non-residents, according to village documents.

The recommended fee schedules are shown below:

Train Station Current Quarterly Fee Staff Recommendation Alternative Proposal
Belmont Train Station

$80 Resident

$110 Non-Resident

$100 Resident

$120 Non-Resident

$90 Resident

$140 Non-Resident

Main Street Train Station and Parking Deck (Lot S)

$80 Resident

$110 Non-Resident

$100 Resident

$120 Non-Resident

$90 Resident

$140 Non-Resident

Fairview Train Station

$75 Resident

$105 Non-Resident

$80 Resident

$110 Non-Resident

$90 Resident

$140 Non-Resident

According to village staff, their proposal would increase annual revenue by $65,000, while Barnett's would increase revenue by $81,500.

Because the staff proposal has already been reviewed by Metra and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, the fees would go into effect in the second quarter of 2013 if approved. Should the council opt to pursue the alternative, village staff would have to go back to Metra and BNSF—delaying the implementation until the third quarter of 2013.

On Tuesday, the council will vote on an ordinance the removes parking fees from the municipal code, and places them under administrative regulation. Staff has recommended approval of the ordinance, and will seek direction on which fee proposal to pursue.

The proposed increases to commuter parking rates came about after last year's Downtown Parking Study, which found that the quarterly fees for commuter parking spaces were lower than nearby stations, according to village documents.

The study, conducted by Rich and Associates, found that spaces in nearby Lisle and Naperville cost anywhere from $105 to $145 per quarter, according to village documents.

The Downers Grove Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday at Village Hall, 801 Burlington Ave. For more information, visit www.downers.us.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

There are plenty of ways to keep up on Downers Grove news:

Related Topics: Commuter Parking Fees, Downers Grove Commuter Parking, and village of downers grove

Dan F.

9:17 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

The campaign must be in full swing. Less of an increase for potential voters. and more for non residents. The same dollar increase for both must be beyond council's mental grasp!

Reply
Comment_arrow

PAUL C.

7:27 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

It's the game they play Dan. Political posturing at it's best so talking points can be used later during the campaign. The village manager got a hefty $20k raise last year and only 2 council members voted against this. One is not running for re-election and the other is. It's easy to play the game when you know 5 (including the mayor) are voting "yes". It looks good on a political resume that your are a fiscal conservative and can be used in April and possibly down the road for bigger and better positions. I know the game and have watched this 4 block in action. God help us if they sweep in April. They can have the meetings from home and skype in.

Max Gruppy

10:14 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

We don't need to raise the fees for anyone. Commuters recently saw nasty increases in Metra fees (+28% DG to Union Station) and may face more. If we need more money let's put a city tax on cigarettes rather than a tax on going to work. Is Bob Barnett against people going to work?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Amanda Luevano

6:26 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

Max,

I think you may have read into my word choice a little too much. As I mentioned in the article, this measure—along with the water rate hike—is part of the budget implementation process for 2013. I'll have another article after it's discussed publicly tomorrow. Hopefully I'll be able to answer your questions better then. Thanks for your patience and readership!

Patch_comments_icon

Amanda Luevano

10:47 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

Just to clarify, I believe they've worked this revenue into their budget plan for next year, which is why they are discussing this in the first place.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Max Gruppy

6:11 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

I am interested in facts. I am not the least bit interested in what you believe. You mention "this revenue" but don't give a number. What revenue?

Comment_arrow

Max Gruppy

7:16 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

Is your belief based on something the board said or did? If so, would you be kind enough to elaborate? Or is it a secret?

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Amanda Luevano

7:21 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

Max, it's not a "belief." Please forgive my choice of words. It says right in the village documents that these actions are part of the budget implementation process for next year. It's under the meeting agenda on www.downers.us if you want to take a look. It's not a secret. I just think I'll be able to elaborate more once the village has had a chance to discuss and/or vote publicly.

Max Gruppy

11:29 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

What increase was budgeted? $65,000, $81,500, or some other amount?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Martin Tully

12:01 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Max: The adopted FY2013 Budget contemplates a price increase going into effect in mid-2013 that would result in increased annual revenue of $30,000 from parking permit fees for the partial year. (See page 4-25 of the FY2013 Budget document: http://www.downers.us/public/docs/vlg_budget/2013%20Proposed/4_FUND_Summaries.pdf) Thus, the budgeted increase is ~ $65,000 for a full year. Hope that helps.

HunterPSU

1:29 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

Our government(s) federal, state, local are all going broke..Little fees here and there will eventually suck all the money out of our pockets.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Amanda Luevano

12:04 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Thanks for the clarification, Mayor Tully!

Reply

Max Gruppy

8:35 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012

Thank you to Martin Tully for the comment and link above. It is comforting to know there is some thought, and some actual numbers, behind the madness.

Reply

Leave a comment