patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Candidate for 81st District

The DuPage Tea Party Announces Endorsement for the March 20th Primary Election, 81st District

Press release
For immediate release:


The DuPage Tea Party Announces First Endorsement for the March 20th Primary Election DuPage County, IL
The DuPage Tea Party is pleased to announce the decision to endorse Debbie Boyle as our choice for State Representative in the 81st district. The decision was made as a result of widespread fiscal irresponsibility that has plagued our state.  Debbie is a true Conservative candidate who reflects fiscal values as well as other beliefs and values of the DuPage Tea Party such as the opposition to the Dream Act, Amazon Tax, and the Smart Grid.  We encourage all voters to vote for Debbie Boyle.
                                                              
###
Contact information:
Claire Van Horn
Dupageteaparty@gmail.com
630-708-6-TEA

Lee

1:00 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

3 out of the 4 elected officials supporting Debbie Boyle make over $250k as elected officials? Wow. Are they part of The DuPage Tea Party? Doesn't seem too "Tea Party" to me...

To hear the DGTRO is a private club and that they changed their by-laws THIS year to support Brian Krajewski and Debbie Boyle is scandalous and corrupt at best.

Is Brian Krajewski affiliated with The DuPage Tea Party?

Reply

Greg Abbott

4:25 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

The Tea Party meeting refused to let Ron Sandack speak at their meeting. Krajewski's right hand man Greg Boltz was timing the speakers at the Tea party forum. They have had DGTRO Vice Chairman Bob Grogan be a speaker at their meetings. You can decide for yourself the relationship and interconnections between the DGTRO leadership and the Tea Party.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

4:30 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

So Greg, is ANY group not affiliated with Brian Krajewski endorsing Debbie?

D Carlson

4:37 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

All you people need a life. You all just ruin a local news website by crapping all over everything with your bickering. Have a nice day.

Reply

PAUL C.

6:59 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Again if they don't endorse Ron they are controlled by BK. Brian is the leader of the Tea party...ha ha and the Illinois Liberty Pac is filled with bad people. Dan Proft has a horrible conservative Republican talk show on WLS and theTea Party is so RIGHT winged are the banter of Ron's group. These two endorsements would have been welcomed with open arms by Ron but these two groups know the real story on Ron and see the voting record. They see the Dream Act vote with open eyes. This vote is one that I and others know Ron is trying hard to hide, bury and difuse in these final days. The Heat is on and the Elephant is nowhere to be found but that smaller animal is everywhere and the voting record says it loud and clear. One trip to www.dggab.com and you can view the factual voting record of Ron Sandack from council to appointed senator. It will help make your decision crystal clear.

Reply

PAUL C.

8:01 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

uofcdoc what's your name? People know me and that's why I post as Paul C.

Reply

Max Gruppy

10:08 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Debbie, What is your opinion of Illinois Public Act 97-632, passed in December to steal state income tax refunds from us? Would you have voted for it? Did the person you're running against vote for it or oppose it?

Reply

AC

1:14 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Kurt
I think the village is looking for volunteers.your a lock to get that appointment.
Hurry
Before you change your mind and candidate.Baby

Reply

DG Guy

2:43 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Slightly Off topic: I've received 2 robo calls on my cell phone during work hours from Debbie's campaign. Maybe it's just a peculiarity of mine but I see this as terribly rude. I know nothing of her stance but now have a negative perception of her.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Melanie C

4:00 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012

I have received upwards of 10-12 robo calls during work hours for various candidates. I know nothing of their stance but now have a negative perception of all those individuals. Maybe I am tired and not understanding this post. DG Guy do you have a negative perception of comcast etc. when they call during dinner or are you just annoyed being bothered at work? I am not trying to pick a fight, I just don't know why you would have a negative perception of someone just because you received a robo call during work hours. It is election time and I am certain you have received other robo calls. Where you equally bother by those?

Comment_arrow

DG Guy

9:07 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

I have my cell at work in case there is a family emergency. Debbie's campaign robo called yesterday, my cell went off and everyone within 20 feet stopped and glared at me. I answer in case my kid is on fire, hear Debbie, hang up and then have to apologize to a room full of co-workers. If she had called at home between 5:00 and 8:00 I would not have cared.

UoCDoc

7:40 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

HUGE ENDORSEMENT for Senator Sandack today by the Chicago Tribune.
Notables:
"Few public officials walk the walk like Republican Sen. Ron Sandack"
"He gets high marks for his work ethic"
"he's famous for actually reading the bills"
"he's not afraid to take the heat for an unpopular vote"
"He's endorsed over Deborah Boyle, a registered nurse"

Congratulation Ron!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-house3-20120309,0,4118500.story

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan F.

8:52 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

Interesting the Trib endorses a Deomcrat Verschoore who voted for the job killing Amazon Bill and to abolish the Death penalty instead of fix it while under moratorium, and down the page endorses a Republican Sandack who voted for the job killing Amazon Bill and to abolish the Death Penalty instead of fix it under moratorium.

PAUL C.

9:29 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

This article relating to Sandack's followers was also in the paper on Feb 24th. Let's not sweep it under the table in this District 81 race,

http://triblocal.com/downers-grove/2012/02/24/political-rivals-block-commission-appointment/

Reply

PAUL C.

9:36 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

Mapped into the same district as Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno, he decided to run for the House instead.

This is statement in the Tribune article made me fall off my chair! "DECIDED"....ha ha more like was "DIRECTED TO" ...is there a typo here?

Reply

Eileen Kenah

11:50 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

My main concern is if Debbie Boyle can't make some local Q & A sessions in order to be elected, or take the time to answer publications questions on her own time, how is she going to find the time to legislate in Springfield? When I look at her "Where I Stand" on her website, her stands pretty much mirror that of Ron Sandack. I look at it in this way. We have 2 candidates that have very similar stances. In my opinion, Ron Sandack is not the "political insider" as his detractors claim. If 2 candidates have the same stance and one has spent some time already getting familiar with the layout of Springfield, why wouldn't I vote for the one that does not have to spend any down time learning the ropes. And by the way, just because Ron Sandack has been in Springfield, does not mean he is "an insider". I recall the quote, "Keep you friends close and your enemies closer." I am not saying anyone in our legislature as an enemy, but if you know the players and their plays, you can deal with them more effectively. If Ron Sandack is not a conservative as Debbie Boyle supporters suggest, then I guess I am not a conservative either.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

1:29 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Actually, Mrs. Boyle answered the Chicago Tribune's questionnaire (scroll to General Assembly 81st):
http://elections.chicagotribune.com/editorial/#&lid=Endorsements&lpos=Sub

The Editorial Board considered her answers as well as Senator Sandack's, and came back with a ringing endorsement for the Senator:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-house3-20120309,0,4118500.story

PAUL C.

12:35 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Ron didn't refuse to take the appointment after saying "All I wish to be is a great mayor not a career politician" March 26th, 2010-DgReport. Similar stances Eileen,...I beg to differ. Here is a direct quote from Debbie:

As your Illinois state representative I will vote to restore the death penalty to Illinois and I would not have voted as my opponent did last spring when he stripped away an important tool from our law enforcement agencies.
The Dream Act is another story. Here is what the story is across the country and :Sandack Votes Yea For Illinois Dream Act
"Illinois is moving in the opposite direction of the rest of the country. I believe that there are 11 other states that have a version of the DREAM Act and I think in nine of them there are movements to get rid of it," said Maryland State Delegate Patrick McDonough.
Illegal Means.......ILLEGAL

Debbie stands opposite of Ron on this issue.

The Dupage Tea Party endorsed Debbie because of her true conservative Republican values. Ron again was not worthy of this endorsement because of his voting record. Ron would have welcomed this endorsement with arms open.

Ron has no visible affiliation with the party for a reason and that reason is he wants to be an independent and those 2 votes alone in MY eyes and many other voters eyes is a reason NOT to vote for him. He can give all the reasons under the sun but for ME as a citizen and a voter the Dream Act and Death Penalty votes were enough for me to say NO.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

1:36 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Paul:
The Chicago Tribune endorsed Senator Sandack today is his run for the 81st. Interestingly, they were able to conclude that he is, indeed, a Republican (and one who "walks the walk"). Not sure where your news flash came that the Senator has no visible affiliation with the Republican Party.

Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

3:47 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

I would love to hear you address my comment on Debbie being available to serve her term if elected. From the Daily Herald Article on 2/20/12 "Boyle did not respond to several Daily Herald interview requests over the past several weeks, including for this story, and did not attend a Friday afternoon endorsement interview with Sandack and members of the newspaper’s editorial board. Boyle left a voice mail with the Daily Herald late Friday evening, in which she blamed a hectic work schedule and confusion among her campaign workers for her failure to respond." From the Downers Grove Bugle on March 2 "Boyle, a registered nurse with Loyola University Health System and vice president of the board with High School District 99 said that she’s been busy, and attends the events that she can, but she’s particularly attended events supported by the Downers Grove Republican Township Committee." I can't understand why a candidate that thinks she is the best candidate, would not be available at forums for the public benefit so the constituancy can get to know her better.

Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

3:51 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Ron has been a firm believer and supporter of term limits. When the quote was made in 2010, I believe he was referring to his term as mayor and not even considering state office.
According to Ron's website he says" I am co-sponsor of SB 2277 which would set up uniform criterion for the limited and reasoned use of the death penalty; only for the worst of the worst offenders. I voted to end the use of an unjust death penalty law due to its unfair and poor implementation."
As far as the Dream Act, I agree with Ron's comments. "To suggest that the innocent children of illegals who did nothing more than be born ought not have the same opportunities as other children in Illinois makes no sense." I could care less what a Maryland State Delegate says. Not sure why is worried about what is going on in Illinois.

PAUL C.

1:45 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Mapped into the same district as Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno, he decided to run for the House instead. - from the Chicago Tribune endorsement.

I think the conversation went like this: Ron, you can't run against Christine. You wouldn't have a prayer of winning and WE need you to step down from Senator to Illinois State rep. You may even get to run uncontested or against some push-over like Christine will get if you're lucky. We know you'll do fine and you'll get plenty of special interest backing money from Springfield.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

9:43 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Paul, you still haven't addressed my question on how Debbie would be able to serve her constituents if she is elected. She can only make time to appear at "events supported by the Downers Grove Republican Township Committee." as she is quoted in the Bugle. I can't understand why a candidate who thinks she is the best candidate, would not be available at forums for the public benefit so the constituancy can get to know her better. I hope the scenario is not going to be - Debbie gets elected, is too busy to serve her term, and then appoints someone else to serve it.

PAUL C.

1:51 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Don,

I really want to say that other R word but I might get in big trouble. lol

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

1:55 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

It's OK if you call me Right Paul. I can handle it.

PAUL C.

4:15 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Eileen,

Interesting that you could care less that only 11 states of 50 ONLY have a version of the DREAM ACT. I guess the other 39 states just don't get it but Ron and the rest of the Senators do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cincinnatus

9:42 am on Sunday, March 18, 2012

The Illinois DREAM act is significantly different that the DREAM act at the Federal level. The Illinois act allows children who are allowed to have valid Illinois drivers licenses, have paid their taxes, have no criminal record to receive PRIVATE funds for higher education.

I cannot see how ANY Republican would not vote for such a bill. Is it preferable that these children, who ain't going away, to remain illiterate and a detriment to society? As a conservative Republican, I can tell you that without such common-sense measures being supported by our party, we look stupid to the rest of the people.

Until REAL immigration reform takes place at the Federal level, Illinois's action make sense.

PAUL C.

4:19 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Don,

I am not calling you anything but one has to admit Ron's voting record is definitely NOT to the Right! The other animal smaller than an elephant keeps popping into my head. Ron already has let us all know he doesn't like the elephant or being tagged a R word that is on most R candidates running in the state. This is a fact isn't Ron? I can find any elephants or R words anywhere. Really disenchanted with the party he must be.

Reply

PAUL C.

4:40 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

What's really interesting is that Lee was the first one to blog on this wonderful positive article about the Dupage Tea Party endorsing Debbie Boyle and then UofCDoc who I still don't know really is, jumps in with his Tribune endorsement for Ron. Can't you get your own Patch article on Ron's Huge Endorsement? The Tea party doesn't endorse members of that other party that starts with an R that resembles the Republican party so get over it. The Tribune doesn't know or care if the candidate is a real Republican or not. The perfect reason for endorsing Ron.

Reply
Comment_arrow

UoCDoc

2:02 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Paul,

You do know who I am and we discussed politics when you sold me my flooring. I support Ron because he is the real deal. If we had more folks like Sandack in Springfield, Illinois would be a better place to live. Go on and play your little "I hate Ron" game for now.

Don Jankowski

4:58 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Paul -- you need to get off of the Republican bandwagon like you own the party. Senator Sandack has demonstrated his mettle to the Chicago Tribune, earning their unbiased endorsement in the Republican primary. He walks the walk -- all you do is talk.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan F.

5:35 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

John V. Moore
‏ @johnvmoore
Follow
@RonSandack on behalf of the Democrats I would like trade Larry Dominick to the GOP in exchange for you
7:17 AM - 28 Jan 12 via Twitter for iPhone · Embed this Tweet

PAUL C.

5:09 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

You sound a little upset Don! Seems now you want to be part of the party. Maybe Ron should have thought about that before he decided to exclude all symbols of the party on his literature, website and ads. He walks the walk according to WHOM? We have voting record FACTS that contradict the FIVE to REVIVE propaganda and that upsets you all. Why would a candidate who is so Republican disassociate himself with the party? You see the Democrats in Dupage county know exactly what Debbie is. She puts it right out there! NO Dream Act vote yes for her. We and the citizens know what she stands for. I and others are a little unsure of what Ron stands for. I could care less if the mighty Tibune endorsed him...so what! They have endorsed candidates in the past and they have lost. The only thing that matters on March 20th is who the VOTERS endorse with their votes.

Reply

PAUL C.

5:58 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Wow! So much for Ron taking the high road! Just got my mail and Rino Teamster Ron has really unleashed a sack of more propaganda! I guess the Five to Revive wasn't working on enough voters outside the neighborhood. Real class act Ron for an appointed senator who is supposed to be the FAVORITE. Ron must really be worried that he ordered the unleashing of this barrage that I've been predicting 10 days out. Candidates make desperate claims when they are worried. This mailer looks like Lee and Thomas designed it. Definitely not Don's design or even Uofcdoc's style! I enjoyed it. Ron likes to put that FACE of his everywhere. Even befor the Streaming Ron Patch Ads came along we had to see his Senate reports that he were written for him. The Heat is On! The next 10 days should be interesting. I found this mailer hilarious but couldn't find anything about his YES votr for the DREAM ACT. I guess that isn't part of this comedy. I think most of the voters don't find it too funny that ILLINOIS is only 1of 11 states in the USA with a version of the Dream Act. Independent Ron is...the other 39 states don't know as much as him!

Reply

Eileen Kenah

6:09 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

I am not sure what the big opposition is to the Dream Act. The following is Ron Sandackl's quote on why he voted for it. "Yes, on one hand it can be argued that the Dream Act is an unnecessary law – private money only via a volunteer board. No, that does not take legislation ... BUT the leadership in charge in Springfield were running the bill (because they can) and were trying to embarrass Republicans and portray us as Latino haters and the party of old white guys. Latino voters are resoundingly pro-work/anti-welfare and very family oriented – priorities that the historically define the Republican Party and are priorities I believe ought to be at the top of any list. To suggest that the innocent children of illegals who did nothing more than be born ought not have the same opportunities as other children in Illinois makes no sense." I guess I must be a liberal since I think it is right to give children of Illegal immigrants an opportunity. It is not their fault that their parents chose to come here illegally to try to give them a better life. What are our other options? To deport them, or to relegate them to low paying jobs when they may be capable of much more.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Melanie C

9:43 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Eileen,
No it's not their fault that their parents chose to come here illegally. However, maybe it would make them think twice before breaking the law and crossing the borders illegally!!! Your thinking is extremely flawed, in my opinion. We have good friends whos daughter is very smart and hard working. However, they are having a hard time with college tuition. Even with scholarships, it is going to be difficult. Are you suggesting that an illegal Latino child should receive the education over the American citizen whos parents were law abiding citizens? Let's stop making things easy for the law breakers!

Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

11:06 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Melanie, I am not suggesting “that an illegal Latino child (or any nationality for that matter) should receive the education over the American citizen whose parents were law abiding citizens?” I am suggesting that we allow these children to be able to pay in-state tuition rates if they choose to go to an in-state school and allow PRIVATE foundations to be set up with PRIVATE money if people choose to contribute to it, to provide for scholarships. My thought is that these children will either be deported (which is highly unlikely) or will be forced to take low paying jobs which may result in them taxing our system as your husband suggests they all do now. In my opinion (and of course you may disagree with me) “illegal is illegal” is not a valid argument. It would have been illegal for me or you to vote in 1918 but thank goodness the 19th amendment was passed. It would have been perfectly legal for us to have slaves in 1863 but thank goodness for the 13th amendment abolishing slavery. Like your friend, my family will be like your friend’s family, we will have trouble affording college for my 2 children that will be capable of going to college. My 3rd child does not have the mental capacity to go to college. These children did not break the law, their parents did. Let’s stop punishing them for the “sins” of their parents.

PAUL C.

6:23 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

FYI Sandack camp: Though the Tribune endorsed George Ryan in the 1998 Illinois gubernatorial race, the paper subsequently investigated and reported on the scandals surrounding Ryan during his preceding years as Secretary of State. Ryan declined to stand for re-election in 2002 and was subsequently indicted, convicted and imprisoned as a result of the scandal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

9:33 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

I agree with Ron Sandack's stand on the issues. My name is listed as a supporter because of that. I do not contribute to any political campaign nor do I know Sandack personally. Honestly I have probably had more personal interactions with Debbie Boyle but this is not personal. I received Sandack's mailer today and would not have looked at it if you didn't point it out. I could have written it myself. I didn't need the mailer to show me that Debbie Boyle is "Sandack-lite". I figured out myself by going through her "Where I Stand" section of her website. As far as the other items, when you run for public office, your record and history is subject to scrutiny. Debbie Boyle would have been naive to think that these things would not have been brought up.

PAUL C.

6:30 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Blagojevich was also endorsed by the state's Sierra Club, the only Illinois governor ever endorsed by the organization. Does Sierra Club ring a bell Sandack supporters? Aren't they right there on your list of supporters on the Ron for Illinois website? Blago - Sierra Club and Ron is calling Dan Proft "Cicero Dan".

Reply

Jeffrey Crane

6:51 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Wow, have we become a liberal nation. Forget the rule of law, encourage illegal immigration with social programs. We are the only country in the world with such a liberal immigration policy that is taxing us to oblivion. Expat rules in most other countries are very stringent because they do not want people taxing their system. Ron made a big mistake on this one.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

9:15 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

I see it differently Jeff. The Dream Act addresses issues for people that are illegal immigrants through no fault of their own. I prefer to help educate these individuals by allowing them to pay in state tuition and if individuals want to fund their education, it can be done through a PRIVATE trust. Granted, I may not be donating to the private trust but that is my choice. My thought is that these people will then be educated and have the opportunity be productive in our society and therefore pay taxes into the system, instead of "taxing the system". I am wondering what you have proposed as an alternative. Do you have a plan to deport them all-send most of them back to a country they know little about? Should we keep the status quo where the illegal immigrants work jobs where they get paid cash and pay no taxes so they are not discovered? I wonder how many of our relatives came here illegally. My grandparents came to America illegally from Ireland in the early 1900's. Fortunately they worked hard and were able to stay here and build a life for themselves. Don't get me wrong, I am all for restricting/reducing illegal immigration. I would love for there to be a secured border. Obviously our lovely government has not done a good job of getting that done. In the mean time, the Dream Act is addressing the issue of some of the unintentional illegal immigrants.

Jeffrey Crane

6:55 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Jailbirds. Just remember, the same guys/gals that support you today may throw you under the bus tomorrow.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

7:36 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

I think that's a great warning to Debbie Boyle from Jeffrey Crane...

PAUL C.

7:34 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

One other revelation....Ron used the word Republican on his attack-mailer! And he spelled it correctly also. Like the Boyle camp knows Ron is a perfect example of "Republican In Name Only". He had to use the R word and it must have been diificult since it has been missing in action for the entire campaign. So obvious that the RINO description fits him so well. Congrads Ron you used the R word. It must have been a diifficult decision.

Reply

Jeffrey Crane

8:02 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

The Rockin Ron Band
For Ron Sandack Groupies :)

The Love Magnet
http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_5654702

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Cawthorne

9:04 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Haha.... Problem is that the guy in the picture isn't bald.

PAUL C.

9:36 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Ellen,
Thanks for joining the party even if you are in the Teamster Ron camp! 39 THIRTY NINE of 50 STATES have NO DREAM ACT! What else can I tell you. If the law was so wonderful, why do any 11 states only have it as a law? It is another law justifying illegal actions. Illegal is illegal and 39 states agree with that statement.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

10:08 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Yes, and if 39 out of 50 jumped off the Sears Tower (or as I would say in my native New Jersey, the George Washington Bridge) I would not be following them either. My question is what is your solution to the problem of all these illegal immigrants who were brought here as minors?

Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

10:09 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Or better yet, Debbie's solution.

Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

10:16 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

If 3939 of the 50 states do not have the Dream Act, that means a whopping 7,878% do not have it. We will need a lot more states to get to 100% by my estimation.

PAUL C.

9:48 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

This statement is right off the Obama-Bieden for President website:

Republicans seem to think that pandering to the extreme right on issues like immigration is their path to victory—and Romney's pledge to veto the DREAM Act is a prime example.

President Obama has fought alongside millions of Americans on both sides of the aisle to get the DREAM Act passed, because like us, he believes everyone deserves a fair shot.

Stand with the President and fight for the DREAM Act

RINO RON.....what else can a true Republican say? Illegal is illegal comes to mine. Conservative, Independent and Bold. 2 out 3 maybe.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

10:24 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

OK Paul --make sure you get a ride home tonight. You did OK with copy and paste, but "comes to mine" and "2 out 3 maybe" = give someone the car keys. I am 100% sure of that.

Comment_arrow

UoCDoc

1:53 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Paul,

Either you are intentionally misleading others or you are just unable to comprehend the facts. The Illinois Dream Act HAS NOTHING TO DO with the proposed US Dream Act. The only reason it has a similar name was the Democrats in the Illinois GA changed the name to the IL Dream Act in an effort to embarrass Republicans. Nice try.

PAUL C.

10:14 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/01/23/sun-times-to-quit-making-endorsements/In an editorial published Monday, the Sun-Times essentially said as a newspaper endorsements are passé at a time when there are so many other sources of information that “allow even a casual voter to be better informed than ever before.”

I rarely read the Chicago Tribune or Sun-times and this article further explains that not many people today even read the newspaper still. Everyone is on-line, tweeting, on facebook and receiving informative emails for thr most part these days. Thus the endorsement from the Chicago Tribune seems big for the Sandack camp but really is not so big when you think about it. I personally have not looked at the Tribune in months and get most of my information from other on-line sources. Celebrate it, tweet it, facebook it but not many not on your twitter list or fb friend list will read it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

10:46 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Why then did Mrs Boyle ignore other requests to answer questionnaires from papers and organizations, yet submitted answers to the Tribune questionnaire? Because she thought it was "not so big?" In addition, newspapers are actually online (yes Paul, it is true) and have an extensive social media presence. I am pretty sure that Mrs Boyle is not indifferent about not receiving an endorsement that she clearly sought.

PAUL C.

10:35 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Funny Don! I had to reinforce what 39 of 50 means to Ellen. 78% also comes to mind that DON'T have the Dream Act. But Illinois knows better and Ron will lead us to the promised land and justify that the Dream Act is a great humanitary act.

Still waiting for the explanation on that Teamster letter never released back in 2007. That endorsement got buried 5 years ago as the recent doings of Ron's council block look to be buried. Lots of things nipping at Ron's creditability and worrying him that he could actually lose this race. Why else would he send out the attack literature so early? A loss and Ron's career will be derailed. I knew he'd detour from the high-road approach he said he stay on during this campaign! We all expected it and I really got a kick out of seeing his smiling face at the bottom of the over-sized mailer. The smirk is signature stuff that just says "You can't beat me". It's funny and one never knows it may be wiped RIGHT off his face on Tuesday (the 20th of March) evening. He's the Favorite, he's got the Springfield $ and backing, the Tribune and Sierra Club but will he have the votes. Something tells me he's worried. 10 days and approaching and The Heat is On! We know he'll be hard to beat but we also know bigger giants have tumbled.

Reply

PAUL C.

11:21 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

I thought maybe Ron's attack mailer that I received yesterday would have a small section explaining the Teamster letter /endorsement buried from 2007, Dream Act yes vote, reasons for raising taxes every chance he had as a council member and mayor and the recent action of the 4 block council members who are all his products and supporters. All swept under the rug! I did see the word Republican. I wasn't sure you still were one. Five to Revive was nowhere to be found either, replaced by Sandack-lite which is almost as witty as Women for Sandack. The master of mis-direction and canned perceptions. How could anyone be sucked into such a load of desperation. The extra large size of the attack mailer was pompous also. It shows how much money you have to waste on propaganda pieces like this one. Drink the orange kool-aid everyone while you read this. Maybe a booklet will be sent out in the final days. Special Interests contributions can buy lots of propaganda. They need you. They want you. You better not blow this! Attack Ron and sweep and attack. You and your followers know the drill.

Reply

PAUL C.

11:24 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Blagojevich was also endorsed by the state's Sierra Club, the only Illinois governor ever endorsed by the organization. Does Sierra Club ring a bell Sandack supporters? Aren't they right there on your list of supporters on the Ron for Illinois website? Blago - Sierra Club and Ron is calling Dan Proft "Cicero Dan".

Reply

PAUL C.

11:30 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Hey Eileen,

I dug this endorsement up for you. Now I know why you are endorsing Ron.

Realtor Political Action Committee
PO Box 19451

Springfield, IL 62794 $2,500.00
3/2/2012Transfer In
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

Reply

Jeffrey Crane

1:40 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Good job Paul. It doesn't take much effort to dig up all the self-serving connections between these entities and Sandack. People here like to suggest that we are wRONg, but, and I will narrow my statement for Don and not generalize, most of
Ron's supporters (donators) are somehow connected monetarily. There is a benefit to the individual in some way or manner. It is the Illinois way. Play along to get along, code for Pay to Play. They could give a rats patootie about Illinois as long as they get the benefit of his election right here in good old Downers Grove. FACT!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

9:11 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

What are the self serving connections between Jeffrey Crane and his several donations to Debbie Boyle? Totaling $3,500, that we know of. His HUGELY successful blog has been giving Debbie Boyle FREE political advertising for the past 6 months... FREE... Has Debbie Boyle promised him something in return? A plush appointment maybe with some sort of government pension? What is he getting for his investment? Access to Cicero Dan Proft? An audience with Brian Krajewski? It has to be something.

Debbie Boyle's corrupt connections are on display here:

www.dggab.com

Don Jankowski

2:15 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

What "self serving connections?" How are people that donate to the Sandack campaign "monetarily connected?" What does "monetarily connected"mean? Give specific evidence of "Pay to Play." In any courtroom in this country, specific evidence is required to convict someone of wrongdoing. In a civil case, there is a less stringent standard than in a criminal case, but there must be specific evidence. This is not Russia. Be specific, or adjourn your court of patootie.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan F.

10:16 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Teamster Ron has taken cash from both major cigarette companies, and now he opposes the smoking ban in places where the public gathers- bars, casinos, restaurants. This is after he voted YES as Mayor in 2007 for adopting the Smoke Free Illinois Act.

Is that self serving enough? Or is there some mystery double standard that applies to the world but not to Teamster Ron?

"your court of patootie"?

patootie
"sweetheart, pretty girl," colloquial Amer.Eng., 1921, perhaps a corruption of potato (esp. sweet potato).
Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper

Some commenters here really don't know what they are saying, do they?

PAUL C.

2:42 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Special interest groups want special treatment Don. Do you think the Realtor Political Action Committee gave Ron a $2500 donation because they aren't expecting special favors back in Illinois. This is just one of the many Springfield addresses giving big dough to Teamster Ron. Just visit www.elections.il.gov . It's all pretty obvious who Ron will be serving but I know that's what happens when Springfield is calling the shots. I think the conversation went like this: CAPT C: Ron, we don't want you to challenege Senator Radango because you can win this new district 81 State Rep spot easily. Ron: Does that mean I'll lose my Senator label? CAPT C: Yes but we need you in this Illinois State Rep position. Don't worry you'll get plenty of special interest / lobbyist money. You'll murder anybody who runs against you. Ron: Sounds good CAPT C. I guess it's best for MY career path! 2 steps back 1 step forward I guess. I'll still miss that Senator label though.
Welcome to the ERA OF EARN IT! The citizens of the entire 81st district know the score boys and they aren't all drinking the orange stuff. Scard and we know it as the Senator launched a KING-SIZED attack mailer yesterday. Could he get knocked off ? Maybe never know? He's the big favorite. Maybe the Trib will be back to report on the big upset in Dupage.....never know bigger giants have fallen. Seems he's worried about Sandack-lite. The Heat is On and we are all enjoying it. GO BOYLE GO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

4:04 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

James Joyce could not have said it better.

Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

6:07 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

1st of all Paul, my name is Eileen, not Ellen. You must have known that when you googled my name. What is your name Paul C? You mentioned that you don’t have to use it because everyone knows you. I don’t know you. Maybe I can google you too to find out what you do for a living although I really don’t care. Yes, I contribute a measely $50 to the RPAC so they can fight for the rights of business people and stop unnecessary regulations. I had no idea that they contributed to Ron's campaign but I am glad they did. I did not realize that RPAC was a scary and anti-business PAC, especially since all of us Realtor's are self employed. When I joined the discussion, I was hoping that you and your friends might educate me and give me some information about Debbie that may persuade me to vote for her. You have done the complete opposite. You have continued to attack Sandack and his endorsements but have failed to address the major issue I have about Boyle -her ability to serve her term if she is elected. I have brought it up 3 times and no one has addressed it. I have a different take on the conversation that Sandack may have had about running, but it is irrelevant because neither one of us was there. Thanks for solidifying my vote for Sandack!

George Swimmer

7:40 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Ms. Boyle supports the death penalty. I do not! The thought of putting an innocent person to death...that is just too much for me. She will not get my vote. .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeffrey Crane

7:53 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

George, you are in a bit of a pickle. Ron Sandack supports the death penalty, just not in it's present form of administering it. Will you now withdraw you support for him as well. Just a thought....

Jeffrey Crane

8:08 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

10,000 Visits surpassed on www.dggab.com
Get dggab to go for your iPhone and Droid device.
Watch DG TV for live news and political events.
We are going to be a force in this town!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

12:08 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

9,990 by Paul C.

Congrats Jeffrey!

Melanie C

10:01 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Eileen,
I do believe that Ron is still employed by his law firm in the city. I am guessing that he does intend to keep that job. Just guessing on that. So do you think Ron will be able to represent you completely even with his other commitments? He does point out, whenever possible, that he is an ex-mayor, husband, father, little league coach, selfless volunteer in town, member of the loyal order of moose, lawyer, etc. etc. that is a pretty busy schedule. I honestly don't think your complaint is entirely valid. Which one of the balls will hit the floor first for Sandack? Be honest, they both have heavy schedules and obligations. Where Deb might attend, Ron might miss. Vice versa! I will say that Ron does seem to have a stunt double. It does make me wonder what obligation is being neglected. I am not upset that she missed some questionnaires or meetings with newspapers. I don't give a darn who the sun-times, herald or the tribune endorses. Who are they? I dont think they should been be in the business of doing this. Just my opinion. So, you choose who you think will represent your interest the best and be happy with it. Hopefully, regardless of the outcome, the winner will do what's right for the citizens of this district! That's all I really want.

Reply

Eileen Kenah

11:23 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Melannie, thanks for giving a logical thought without attacking anyone. My point is this. Ron Sandack has been able to read the bills presented, go the Springfield and vote- that is what he is there for. I am not concerned what ball "drops" if he is able to do the job of State Representative. If his law firm or family suffers that is not my concern. Debbie Boyle has been too busy with a hectic work schedule to respond to questions or attend events that are not supported by the Downers Grove Republic Township Committee. From her own quotes, I am interpreting that her commitment to being an Illinois State Representative will be the "ball that hits the floor". I totally agree with you that I want whoever wins to do right by the citizens of the district. Debbie is your person and Ron is mine.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Melanie C

9:20 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Eileen,
Thanks for the first sentence recognition. However, I see it as a backhanded attack/compliment. You don't know anything about me or what I am really about. Please refrain from speaking about me attacking anyone. I do try hard to give logical thoughts and I will continue to do so. Maybe you could help me stay the high road course. :)

Don Jankowski

11:49 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Eileen
Welcome to the "discussion" and thank you for using your real name. I joined this discussion a couple of weeks ago. When i expressed a different point of view from those of Paul C and Jeffrey Crane, their immediate response was to call me names and lie about my motives. Dan F will soon do the same to you if you continue to express a point of view that does not support Mrs Boyle. They will attack you with false accusations and lies regarding your motives. Melanie C is Jeffrey's wife and does the same, often using different identities. Jeffrey has contributed thousands of dollars (more than you and the PAC that Paul "exposed" in this thread combined) to Mrs Boyle's campaign -- the size of Jeffrey's contribution requires public disclosure. Google can help explain why an individual gives more than a PAC to Mrs Boyle's campaign. Please stay a part of this discussion. You will get used to the personal attacks in a couple of days. Your point of view matters.
And Paul C -- please have the courage to use your real name when you personally attack any real name blogger. And let Eileen know who you are.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Melanie C

9:33 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Don,
Please stop trying to antagonize me. I have been busy living my life and would appreciate if you would stop dragging me into your game. Perhaps you haven't seen all of my past comments. I am hardly in hiding. I put myself out here just like the rest of you. I don't have any aliases since I really prefer that you all know how I feel about you from my OWN mouth. You seem hell bent on driving away any new people who are seeing things from our perspective. Perhaps that is why you call them me, so you can irritate them and they leave disgusted. Get off your "i am owed an apology jeff crane called me a name and accused me of something blah blah blah" box. From what I understand, we have been awaiting your arrival. You usually come out heavy and hard within the last two weeks of the election. I think you were a tad early this election but either way, you have arrived. I am curious, have you tsk tsked RS over his name calling nasty mailer? Or does that not matter because he is your man!? Accept it Don, both sides are passionate and both sides have been less then mature and both sides have attacked personally and both sides......must I go on?!?! I can't wait for google to tell me why an individual gives more money than a PAC. I am sure they are spot on!!Gosh, it certainly couldn't be because Jeff wants real change and he thinks Deb can do it with integrity and honesty, could it?

Eileen Kenah

12:26 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Thanks for your encouraging words Don! I was taught at a very young age to stand up for what I believe in. My thought on personal attacks is that they are the Liberal's way to respond if you don't have a leg to stand on. When you can't rebut my stance, attack me personally. Right out of the Liberal handbook. I can stand the heat in the kitchen no matter how hot it gets. I am not going anywhere. I just wish we could engage more people so that we can get them to care more about the truth about the issues.

Reply

PAUL C.

7:39 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Eileen, Don, Lee and the rest of you Congrats for having drank the orange cool aid and pledging your souls to Independent Candiadate Ron Sandack. You have presented many reasons all packaged in the Five to Revive portion of the Ronforillinois website. That glorious slogan was no where to be found on the recent attack mailer. I was impressed he used 2 photos of Debbie and only 1 with his smiling face. When I first looked at it, I thought it was a mailer for Debbie. Sandack-lite really! Debbie is so right of Senator Independent Sandack and to even suggest her platform of ideas is close to his is far fetched. I know his record and smart guy, Lee should visit www.dggab.com to look at FACTS that Mr. Crane spent hours reseacrhing on many political topics. Many topics have nothing to do with the Senator! Also take the time and review the monies coming in from the special interest groups and lobbyists on www.elections.il.gov The neighborhood nice guy that I am sure Ron is in bed with these people. I have been in the political arena here in DG since 1999. I never served on board, committee etc. I worked on campaign for many people. I never worked for Ron or the 4 block council members and never voted for any of them. Ask Ron my name. I told him what I would do last April and I kept have kept my promise. He has much to lose should a big upset occur on March 20th. Much much more than his opponent and it may be closer to happening than the Senator is comfortable with.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeffrey Crane

7:49 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

"When I first looked at it, I thought it was a mailer for Debbie."

Haha. So did we.

Jeffrey Crane

7:46 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

"My thought on personal attacks is that they are the Liberal's way to respond if you don't have a leg to stand on."

I agree with that statement, Eileen. That is why I believe Ron is a liberal as testimony by his votes in the senate and whom he keep company with. Lee is a liberal because he is Ron's attack boy. I respect you and your decision as you have been very cordial here and have just stated your position. I have no problem with that kind of debate. Just for the record, Debbie Boyle has been out there pounding the streets and meeting all her obligations. In spite of what some of the spinners suggest here, she missed one questionnaire because of a mix-up which she explained to the herald. Of course the other side is going to jump at the chance to use that against her. So be it. Ron has not attended every function either that most would have expected him to attend and therefore had not received those endorsements or support. That is his strategy. I am surprised that you can get past Ron's engagement with the Springfield establishment and lobbyists. The fact that he is being bribed by corporations and PAC's that do not even reside in the state. Do you see this as a conflict of interest that has plagued this state for decades. Are you not tired of the same old politics in Illinois that has bankrupted the state? How can you then support the status quo? Do you really expect Ron to be this different legislator? So much for the grass roots Mayor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

6:55 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

It's great that Debbie is pounding the street. She has explained her reason for non-response to a questionnaire. My issue is her response " shesaid that she’s been busy, and attends the events that she can, but she’s particularly attended events supported by the Downers Grove Republican Township Committee". I am busy, but if there is something that I am committed to, I take the time to do it or ask for an extension. It seems to me that if she is primarily attending meetings supported by the Downers Grove Republican Committee (as she is quoted) she is not comfortable addressing groups that are not supported by the DGTRC. What is going to happen when she gets to Springfield. The arena is much bigger than the DGTRC. In addition, I have heard that Ron was invited to DuPage Tea Party Meeting on February 9th at the Carriage Greens Country Club in Darien. He received a confirmation that he was on the schedule. When arrived with his supporters, he was told he did not call them and was taken off the agenda. Debbie was there and was allowed to read her prepared statement. If this its true (and of course I was not there but I heard this from someone who was there), sounds like the DuPage Tea Party endorsement was rigged in Debbie's favor.

Jeffrey Crane

8:11 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Eileen:

Take a close look at this information. Then think about Ron Sandack as YOUR legislator. He will not be representing you. That is a fact. Let me know what you think.
Thanks.

Ron Sandack is PAC-MAN
Donations to the Ron Sandack Campaign by Special Interest Groups
Who is he REALLY representing?

http://www.dggab.com/content.php?487-RON-SANDACK-IS-PAC-MAN-All-DONATIONS

Reply
Comment_arrow

UoCDoc

5:59 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Jeff,

Ron received two more endorsements just today!

The Illinois State Medical Society and
The Illinois Society of Advanced Practice Nursing Association

Isn’t Debbie a nurse? Wow, that’s got to sting!

Don Jankowski

8:16 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Jeffrey -- Did you just agree that you are a liberal given the personal attacks that you have made on me and others on Patch? I am glad that you and Eileen agree.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan F.

10:22 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Commenters who insist on being victims should go away. Then there will be no chance for them to display such willful and purposeful ignorance they get insulted, take offense, demand apologies, and then a whine and complain when none are forthcoming.

Which reminds me. No one here has ever factually refuted any statement made or question posed when it comes to Teamster Ron.

What up with that? So all that stuff is true. Well done Mr. Crane.

Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

1:07 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Dan F.
I wasn't complaining -- I simply stated a fact. I didn't make something up that was untrue or deliberately misleading. I leave that for you to do anonymously. I am sorry you are afraid to post what you do under your real name -- kind of embarrassing, huh?. However, it may be reasonable to conclude that you are a Teamster trying to play dirty tricks against a very strong Republican candidate. So you can just be Teamster Dan until you "factually refute" it.

PAUL C.

11:09 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012

9 days to D-day! All whiners leave the war area. Now is not the time to take anything personally. Thanks Ron for exposing the Dan Proft ,a conservative Republican with a successful talk show on WGN radio is who is endorsing Debbie Boyle. We appreciate the fact that you let the voters know this. We now know you have gone into ATTACK-MODE because that easy win isn't looking so easy anymore. I am not asking Ron for an apology because I knew it was what he and his campaign would do. So all you out there wanting apologies and sympathies need to get a copy of Five to Revive and read it, memorize it and stay off the Patch, FB, twitter and any other medium. It's not going to be nice. FACTS on Ron aren't nice and we plan to expose them to as many voters as possible. As we say in the Boyle camp, The Heat is On!

Reply

UoCDoc

1:13 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

The Illinois Review , "The Crossroads of the Conservative Community" just endorsed Ron Sandack for Representative.

On Sandack:

"In Springfield he upped expectations by saying "no" to the pension and benefits, and disowning the legislative scholarships and their corrupt program. "

"Ron Sandack then started working with the Illinois Policy Institute to define issues and solutions that do not grow government, bureaucracy or taxes. His result? 92 percent conservative rating"

On Boyle:
"And it is against such a person the big money guys (Proft, etc.), each a friend of mine, decided to run a cipher. The embittered party guy we all understood: voters had repudiated his mayoralty, so he'd take it out on Sandack. Pure payback. "

"Even worse, and that is no small statement, was her pro-tax voting record. Not once, but twice did she say the only thing wrong with DG high schools is that their taxpayers were not paying enough"

"As a candidate, she has failed to campaign, ignored her candidate questionnaires and, in a most stunning breach, failed to show up for her Daily Herald editorial board interview. "

Read the full story here:
http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2012/03/a-man-for-now.html#more

Reply

PAUL C.

1:29 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Drinking of the orange cool-aid at it's finest. I believe there's a PAC and a action committee of many as I have already shared in a government website: www.elections.il.gov One can't hide or spin much here. My research even shows some of Ron's private donors have donated to the Dem's in the past also. Some of those candidates were backed by a certain Teamster Pres previously discussed in these blogs. Your guy has taken money from all sorts of special interest groups and lobbyists working both sides of the isle. It is fact and documented. Illinois is notorious for getting it done no matter what it takes. Ron fits right in and he is one of the Teamsters favorite Independents (I mean Republicans). UofcDoc, I do not drink the orange cool-aid. I know where the bucks are coming from. I know the spin and know who operates Ron. Ron will reward them should he win. But will he reward you? Appointments come with pay back as do large donations from PAC's and committees. You may not see the game but it's crystal clear to me and many others. Ron knows it and it's why he unleashed his attack-barrage mailer 11 days out! Many aren't drinking the orange stuff and that has the senator worried.

Reply

Don Jankowski

1:32 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Paul -- interesting that you bring up Dan Proft. I was looking at the Illinois Review this morning and came upon an article which questions Mrs Boyle's campaign and her reason for running in the 81st. The author is a regular commentator on Channel 9 during elections. Not a very complementary view of Mrs Boyle's candidacy or some "big money" folks backing her, with an interesting reference to Mr. Krajewski's part in this election. I wonder who the big money people are? Maybe Mr. Proft? Any others? In any event, here is another endorsement for Senator Sandack from Chris Robling of WGN Channel 9:

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2012/03/a-man-for-now.html#more

Reply

Dan F.

1:40 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

http://www.downers.us/top-stories/2011/02/22/political-signs

EX-MAYOR AND VILLAGE COUNCIL HEAD LIAR VIOLATE SIGN ORDINANCE

"Political Signs
Last updated: Public Relations Specialist | Tuesday, February 22, 2011
It's election season again and time to remind everyone of the rules regarding the posting of political signs.
Section 28.1501.04(9) of the Sign Ordinance permits the following for temporary political signs:
Up to a total of 12 square feet of political signage may be placed on private property."

Aren't Teamster Ron's signs 4 x 4 feet= 16 sq ft, violating this rule? Hmm. Ron was Mayor, his campaign manager Bob Barnet is on council; you would think ONE of them would READ THE ENTIRE BILL and not violate it. Should be interesting to see if the Village will enforce it's own code.

One set of rules for the Village, second different set of rules for Ron. Got it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

3:34 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

And a double standard for Dan F. I think Mrs Boyle and Mr Krajewski are tied for the lead in placing signs on public right of ways and private property (vacant lots, shopping centers, etc.) without permission. The ordinance also does not allow that. I didn't think Meadowbrook could look worse -- nice job Dan F. How about removing those hundreds of signs.

PAUL C.

4:38 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

I like those 2 Sandack signs right in front of Bradley's office on Ogden just west of Main St on the north side of the street right on the parkway. They are still there while all other parkway signage is nowhere to be found elsewhere on Ogden. I was going to call village a week ago but I wanted to see how long the village would allow Ron's biggest builder buddy supporter to leave them up.

Reply

Jeffrey Crane

4:52 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Chris Robling is a lobbyist for Altria and Comed. Wow, more connections to be had. Continue to fool the public and make it seem like these people are at all sincere about their endorsements. They have made a mockery of the whole Illinois political system and Ron is their mockingbird. The voters need to wake up to the reality. There will never be change in Illinois until these people are shown the door.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

8:59 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Yet you've remained silent on "Cicero Dan's" connection to Debbie Boyle. Interesting.

PAUL C.

4:58 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

http://www.spoke.com/people/christopher-robling-3e1429c09e597c10009ab0b2

One read on this bio of Robling and you'll know why he endorsed Sandack.

Reply

PAUL C.

7:27 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

FYI: Brian Krajewski like Ron did not respond in a timely manner and guess what he was also denied the opportunity to speak. I just wanted it to be clear that Brian received no special treatment from the Tea Party. This is a fact.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

8:58 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Who's drinking the kool-aid?

Comment_arrow

UoCDoc

7:03 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

Paul,

You are a liar sir. I don't know why Brian did or did not speak at the Tea Party meeting but Ron's denial of access had nothing to do with "responding in a timely fashion". That is pure lie, not fact, and you should be ashamed of yourself sir. How do you look your family in the eye?

Dan F.

7:42 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Altria Client Services Inc. 6601 W. Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23230 $1,000.00
9/12/2011 Individual Contribution
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

Altria Client Services Inc. 6601 W. Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23230 $1,000.00
2/21/2012 1A
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

PS. Teamster Ron now opposes the smoking ban he voted for as Mayor. Amazing what $2,000 can do.

Reply

Lee

8:00 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Glad to see desperation has finally hit...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeffrey Crane

8:26 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

I think you confuse desperation with realization....

Comment_arrow

Lee

8:29 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Realization breads desperation in this case. Good point.

PAUL C.

8:18 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Lee reappears with a one liner! What I and many others think is desperate is that King Sized mailer Ron (I'm taking the high road) Sandack sent out Thursday and Friday! Did you and Thomas design it? Hilarious stuff! When I first looked at it, I thought it was a mailer for Debbie. Did you suggest Ron only get 1 mug shot on this since he popping up all over the Patch constantly. Why else would he launch a barrage of that magtitude on someone whom he thought didn't have a chance? Lee, when candidates are worried they take drastic measures and some are knee jerked in nature. This mailer most likely hurt Ron more than it hurt him. My guess is Dillard isn't launching much at Nybo and Kirk is a much bigger favorite than Ron. Yep, the word is circulating that this is not in the bag for the senator. He's the favorite and with all that special interest/ lobbyist money and we know that he will launch a massive barrage of b.s. in the final 9 days! Just how many people outside of the hood are drinking the orange stuff? We'll all know on March 20th. It's Teamster Ron's race to lose. It will be much more devastating for him if he loses. A career of hugh proportions will be derailed. Special interest groups and lobbyists will be very upset. Just remember they don't vote but many citizens will. Everything points to a pretty good turnout with the Republican presidential candidate still not a for sure! Bigger giants have fallen and Debbie is not desperate....far from it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

8:28 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

I'm not sure why you're so hysterical about the mailer. Is there anything on the mailer that's not true? Debbie Boyle is Sandack-lite.

Considering the negative posts, rumors spread, false information passed as "fact" and an entire blog (complete with 9,990 visits by Paul C) focused on disparaging Senator Sandack by the Debbie Boyle camp, this seems tame by comparison.

Has Debbie Boyle shared the poll numbers yet with you guys?

Have you seen this yet? WOW.

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2012/03/a-man-for-now.html#more

PAUL C.

8:20 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

I made a typo on line 7: should read: mailer most likely hurt Ron more than it helped him.

Reply

PAUL C.

8:49 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Not as hysterical as the June Cleaver (Leave it to Beaver) designed mailer that arrived last Monday (the day of the event). This event was held outside the voting district. A nice slap in the face to the many available venues within the district for a Ron worship to have taken place. Wasn't Emmett's plush enough? Women for Sandack and the King-size Special Interest/Lobbyist sponsored mailer. Really! Quite hilarious! What's next a mailer showing how bad the latest high school ratings are in District 99? Maybe a retraction on all the tax increases Ron voted for as council member and mayor. Kind of like Orwell's 1984: Ron-Speak says tax increases never happened. The past has been re-written and repackaged into Five to Revive. When Five to Revive is looking vulnerable, it's time to launch the offensive. Favorites usually don't have to launch the offensive Lee because they are the favorite! Maybe Ron doesn't like the poll results. That's my educated guess to why he is on the attack. If he was up by 10 or 15% , why would he attack. Polls mean little. Actual votes will mean much more and it's crystal clear that Ron is slightly worried. Again, if loses there will be massive depression in your camp because a mighty "career" of a neighborhood friend will be derailed. Special interest groups, lobbyists, friends from Cook County amongst others will all be very sad! One voice is heard on March 20th and that is of the voters of District 81.

Reply

AC

8:51 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Lots of talk today at church about this election.
Surprised how many people are interested.
Looks like a larger turn out than I thought.
I received mailer and was shocked how early it was sent.
Ron gave voters to much time to review the facts .
What was he thinking.
This race is a lot closer than many think.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

9:33 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

If that mailer was sent out early, kinda makes you wonder what's to come...

Keep up with your delusions of grandeur regarding the closeness of this race. I'm sure you're all doing what you can to keep others motivated.

Lee

8:57 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

An attack piece is something not based in truth. Ron's mailer simply pointed out the fallacy of Debbie Boyle's campaign... All her positions are his, and everyone knows this Paul. A mailer pointing this out seems pretty logical given her campaign of misinformation, dodging candidate forums where she could be questioned on this and refusal to debate Senator Sandack. Wouldn't you agree?

Reply

AC

9:02 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Lee,
Mailer sent out to early.
To much time to research.
I'm glad Debbie has taken the high road.
Good things happen to good people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

9:26 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

That's laughable. What part of the high road has Debbie Boyle engaged in?

Stealing Ron Sandack's platform and trying to pass it as her own?

Speaking at a Tea Party Event knowing Ron couldn't respond?

Falsifying his record during this event?

Not engaging anyone who could question her?

Being too busy to respond to candidate questionnaires?

Associating herself with a bunch of bitter political cronies to further her career?

Suing District 99 in pursuit of privilege?

Running for the school board and having a long standing nepotism rule challenged costing tax payers thousands?

Voting for every tax increase she could possible vote for?

People get what they deserve and in this case, it will be a HUGE loss.

Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

10:23 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

AC the brave, anonymous and probably a Teamster just like Dan F -- you are generally one O short in your comments (at least twice) Hope you don't help kids with spelling. Maybe to (sic) much Sunday NCAA brackets? And you and your church discussed the election in the 81st district today, right? What gospel was that? I am guessing that you bought yourself a ministry online and preached the gospel of Proft (according to Krajewski) over a few beers today.
By the way, if you really have a church that engages in partisan political activity, it is not eligible for 501(c)3 status. I hope you didn't compromise the tax deductions of your members (unless they are a weekend social club).
Maybe you are right to stay anonymous...

Jeffrey Crane

9:38 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

What we have gotten is Ron Sandack, another crony, cut from the same cloth as those that have methodically run this state into the ground. Many more will leave the state as a result. I hope you have saved your money Lee because you are going to have to pick up the slack. And at the end of the day Ron will not be there to keep you afloat. It's the big lie from Springfield. Still not sure why you have such an allegiance, but as you say, you will get what you deserve.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

10:03 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Ron's not a crony Jeffrey and I'll be the first person to call him out if I see him going down that path. Won't happen though.

Does your support of Cicero Dan's candidate Debbie Boyle make you feel ANY better about cronyism though?

Have you ever thought about why Dan Proft ran for Governor?

PAUL C.

9:42 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

One visit to www.elections.il.gov Lee (I know it upsets you to go on that website) and you'll see all of the Senator's contributions. This is a government website. I didn't make up the list of contributions. Here's a sampler. I suggest you take a view for yourself.

Associated Beer Distributors of Illinois PAC
PO Box 396

Springfield, IL 62705 $5,000.00
2/21/2012Transfer In
Citizens to Elect Ron SandackAT&T Services, Inc. on behalf of AT&T Illinois
225 West Randolph, 27B

Chicago, IL 60606 $1,500.00
10/19/2011Individual Contribution
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

AT&T Services, Inc. on behalf of AT&T Illinois
225 West Randolph, 27B

Chicago, IL 60606 $3,000.00
2/21/2012Individual Contribution
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

Health Care Council of Illinois
1029 S 4th Street

Springfield, IL 62703 $5,000.00
2/16/2012Transfer In
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

Illinois Chamber Political Action Committee
215 East Adams

Springfield, IL 62701 $5,000.00
3/2/2012Transfer In
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

We Mean Business
200 S. Wacker Drive
Suite 4000
Chicago, IL 60606 $5,000.00
2/13/2012Transfer In
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

Realtor Political Action Committee
PO Box 19451

Springfield, IL 62794 $2,500.00
3/2/2012Transfer In
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

Nope, no special interests groups on this list! And the website has more. There's a lot of money here! Better pull it out Ron!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

9:55 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

I've been to that web site to detail the contributions to Debbie Boyle's campaign from:

Cicero Dan Proft $5,000 from PAC

Dan's political sugar daddy, Richard Uihlein for $5,000

As well as our very own Jeffrey Crane for $3,500

I'm all for special interest donations as long as they can be tracked to see if ANY votes have been bought. None have and none will be. So please keep posting.

AC

9:47 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Lee,
Don't be late on your tuition.
I'm enjoying the school system.
You should've taken advantage of a great school system.
Your loss not mine.
High road in not debating him.
She would've ripped his voting record to pieces.
Does he support the death penalty or not
Changes week to week
Vote Debbie Boyle Mar 20th your only choice

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

10:13 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Ripped... Yeah, she would have read from a piece of paper that someone had written for her and ripped off all Ron's positions.

Does Debbie Boyle have any thoughts of her own or is she still regurgitating Ron Sandack's platform from index cards?

Vote Debbie Boyle Mar 20th, your only choice... to resuscitate the pay to play politics of Brian Krajewski...

Vote Ron Sandack. One who walks the walk.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-house3-20120309,0,4118500.story

PAUL C.

9:59 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

One other thing Sandack camp: What occurred in the council is connected to the Senator and it will not be swept away. The 4 want it to go away to take the pressure off their maker. Many citizens are asking questions and we plan to make sure this power play issue is not swept under a rug.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

10:13 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

We all know Paul... We know.

PAUL C.

10:13 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Lee,

Always an answer and I could have posted 3 times at least to fit all of Ron's Special Interest group contributions. A lot people will vote on March 20th in District 81. None of them will have Springfield and Chicago addresses. Keep a spining Lee, you could only question a government list of contributions! Funny that Facts are hard for you and the cool-aid drinkers to swallow. We know of a private donor also with some interesting ties but we aren't quite ready to let them out yet. Stay tuned and this news will be released in the next 5 days. We research thoroughly and like presenting facts to back up the barrage we'll launch. It's going to be a fun 9 days (really 8 ) and those with thin skin better stay on the sidelines. No apologies will be issued. Have a good night and try to figure out who will be exposed. Debbie is on the rise and the Heat is On. We are right there and Ron knows it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

10:32 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

If "special interest" donations are so bad, why has Debbie Boyle accepted them?

Does it make a difference if it's 3 or 30?

If these types of donations were so alarming to Debbie Boyle and her supporters, she should have returned the Liberty PAC donation immediately upon receipt. I would have had some respect for her... She didn't though did she... She kept the "special interest" money with thoughts of more and more rolling in. It never did and that's why you're bitter.

Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

11:00 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

I find it very interesting that there is no tab on Debbie's website on who her supporters are. Her 1st tab is "How to Help". One could interpret that Debbie's 1st priority is "what can you do for me" rather than what she can do for her constituants. Jeffrey Crane is the only Debbie supporter that is using his full name. So much for transparency. Makes me wonder who is supporting her that does not want their name associated with her or who is supporting her that she does not want people to know about? Just a thought.

AC

10:59 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Don,
I always forget the O.
Sometimes I'm distracted with o's and zeros counting my money.
Church is always a place of conversation.
What was sooo surprising today at church was the ooolder folk and negativity for Ron.
I asked why,response why did he say he wanted to the mayor and then just left.
My response to become a career politician.
Maybe the President of the United States.
He has some union friends.
Back to counting the money

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

11:54 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

r u a rapper?

I always wanted to type that -- AC, enjoy your church of the NCAA tournament. Make sure to report any wagering winnings,

If you are conscious later this week, try to vote.

(honestly hope you are OK -- please stop whatever you are doing and go to sleep)

Don Jankowski

11:34 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

What are Mrs Doyle's accomplishments in public office (or even as a volunteer)? Has she done anything noteworthy? I know she ran for D99 twice because she felt slighted (according to her Tea Party speech) due to not being able to have a kid go to a school outside of where she lived, She has approved every tax increase after squeaking by in her second D99 run. What has she done other than seek special favor and vote for more taxes? Please try to answer this. I know Mrs Boyle is a nurse (as is my wife), but we both asked about what record this candidate has in service of any kind. Where's the beef?

Reply
Comment_arrow

PAUL C.

6:55 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

Don,
Boyle not Doyle. Doyle is the name of the general contrator for the new property going up on the northeast corner of Main and 63rd street. Ron knows all about tax increases. Let's not let everyone forget them like your camp wants to forget what happened in our council last month. Here let's refresh you and the voters with a collection of Ron's conservative voting record:

*From 2007-2010 as Mayor, Sandack voted YES for Total Appropriations increases of 29.27%, voted YES to increase debt 30% (Source CAFR reports filed with State Comptroller), and voted YES to raise property taxes almost 17% (homeowner property tax bill)
12/14/2010- Voted YES for 2010 Aggregate Tax Levy that raised taxes 7.6%
12/15/2009 Votes YES to increase Home Rule sales tax from .75% to 1%.
12/18/2007- Voted YES to raise HR sales tax from .5% to .75%.

12/21/2004- Voted YES as Council Commissioner in favor of an 9% increase in Aggregate Tax Levy. The Mayor at the time said “He doesn’t believe the residents have received a 9% increase on their salaries.” Sandack seconded and voted for the 9% increase. “Not to pass this would be irresponsible in his opinion. They have Home Rules Sale Tax that will sunset by its own terms relatively soon. He has no intent to resurrect that tax."
Anymore FACTS needed on council on coucil member / mayor Ron's tax voting records...just let us know? They are public as are Ron's past comments. Many may disturb those that elected him in 2007.

PAUL C.

6:13 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

Eileen,
Lee, Thomas, Don and Ron all know me. I even early in the race put it out there on the Patch for Lee. I have been rapping (no Don I'm not AC) in this current race long long before I even knew you were a realtor in this town and I know quite a few. One other realivation, they all will not vote for Ron. I will give you a Sandack Sainthood for your support of Ron. You are the voice of the local realtor pool right in line with the Realtor Political Action Committee, a lobbyist group that Ron will owe favors to should the giant not tumble. Hopefully the favors will protect the seller and the buyer.
I have to give you credit though. Not many realtors would put their name out there on a blog in fear of pissing off potential buyers or sellers in DG or the district. Hang in here with us, it's going to get intense in these last 7 days. Blogging will mean little on the 20th. It's Saint Sandack of Springfiled's race to win or lose. Big big dough and so many Chicago and Springfield addresses on those contribution lists. A loss would really upset them all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lee

4:02 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

For the record, I don't know Paul C. I know several people who do know him and they all say he's a great guy...

TerryP

10:57 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

To those of you who think a PRIVATE fund for children of illegal immigrants is a good thing, please consider this. The argument that we should not punish these innocent children just because they were born to lawbreakers is ludicrous. What about those children born with drugs in their systems to drug addicted parents? I am sure that their lives are not going to be all flowers and rainbows. What if a few of them beat the odds and work hard in school but can't even come close to affording college. Shouldn't they get the same PRIVATE fund DREAM ACT law enacted for them too? Seriously, they didn't ask to be born to law breaking parents who have no concern for the welfare of their unborn child(ren). Don't you want them to be good citizens who will not suck off the system and pay taxes? I just don't see why anyone would think this is a good law to enact. So what if the democrats are trying to show the republicans as old white men who hate latinos. Essentially, by saying this, they are telling you that unless you set up some easy road for them and their children, then you hate them. Great!! This is very logical and I am sure it will be the only system that won't be abused in anyway. Why does this have to be signed into the law books. Do we really need to legislate a PRIVATE fund ? In my opinion, private would not warrant legislation by our PUBLIC servants!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

12:01 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

I absolutely think children born of drug addicted parents should have the same opportunity. There are already vehicles in place to give them these opportunities. They are already entitled to in-state tuition and any scholarships that qualify for. Like the illegals that are children of immigrants, not all of them will be able to beat the odds. Why not give them the chance. As I asked earlier, are you going to have them deported? If not, you are relegating these children to be a drain on our tax dollars. Ron's quote agree with your question on why this should be legislated, "Yes, on one hand it can be argued that the Dream Act is an unnecessary law – private money only via a volunteer board. No, that does not take legislation ... BUT the leadership in charge in Springfield were running the bill (because they can) and were trying to embarrass Republicans and portray us as Latino haters and the party of old white guys. Latino voters are resoundingly pro-work/anti-welfare and very family oriented – priorities that the historically define the Republican Party and are priorities I believe ought to be at the top of any list."

Eileen Kenah

11:54 am on Monday, March 12, 2012

Thanks for giving me credit Paul. The thought crosses my mind periodically to not put my name on my posts for that exact reason. Some things are too important to me to be silent about. I don't care that these people know who you are. I don't, and anyone else who might come to this discussion as a newcomer doesn't. Does that mean that you may have some customers you may be afraid to offend as well?

Now, back to the issues. Debbie and Ron's history of raising taxes makes them more similar than not. So Debbie is going to be elected and all the sudden change the way she votes, if she can even find time to get to Springfield, read the bills and vote on them? I'll give you the argument for that. You are looking at Ron’s voting record as Mayor which is a different arena from state legislature. I am sure you can use that argument for Debbie as well.

On another note, you keep talking about what happened in the council. Why are you not posting the details? You talk about it in vague terms. Are you talking about the Mark Thoman appointment? Although I have never met Mark, I like the posts I used to see on the DGReport by him. I recall a similar incident years ago where one of Krajewski's appointments was suddenly blocked and he had a hissy fit and fired all the VOLUNTEER Commissioners. That event is what caused me to vote against Krajewski for mayor. I am guessing that this current election goes all the way back to that incident.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PAUL C.

12:05 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

PAUL CAPPETTA - are you happy now! So what, everyone knows me on this blog. Don even called me by name.
Anyway so if Brian did it back in his *8 year mayorial term, it lessens what these 4 block council members did? Didn't Ron promise a new more transparent, citizen friendly government when he won in the TIME FOR CHANGE era. Aren't all 4 of these block council members products of Ron and on his endorsers list? Here's what happened and it's pretty simple. Mr.Thoman's refusal is the revenge launched by Ron through the 4 council members in repayment for being snubbed by the DGTRO. Let's make no mistake....pretty transparent and they are all transparently quiet. I watched the entire last council meeting on Tuesday, March 6th. They (4 of them) and Ron just want this to go away!

Eileen Kenah

1:23 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

My point was Paul that you kept dancing about this issue without laying out on the line and describing what the issue is. Since I am not part of the "in" crowd, I have no idea why they did not support Tully's appointment of Thoman. I wonder what proof you have that it was revenge? I think you are giving Ron credit for a little too much power.
So, is Debbie going to be able to serve her term if elected as i have continued to ask. he she going to have time to read all the bills and get to Springfield to vote? As I have said, that is my main concern here. I am majorly concerned that if elected, she will step down and appoint one of her supporters - although I don't know who any of her supporters are other than Jeffrey and you at this point. Not very transparent if that is the case. None of you have been able to give me some level of comfort that she will be able to fulfill her commitment if she is elected.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Melanie C

9:11 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Hi Eileen,
I would venture to say that their aren't many vocal supporters for Debbie on here because they see what Jeffrey and Paul and myself have had lobbed at us. We try to provide facts and such but get blasted which sadly pushes us to sometimes blast back. It isn't always the best course of action but never the less, it has been done. As for Debbie being able to represent you and serve out her term, I imagine that she knows what the job entails. I don't believe that she plans on reading the bills, voting on the bills, and everything the job requires from here in DG. I suppose I could be wrong but I don't think I am. I guess Ron is like your comfort food. He has been around when you think you have needed him. He seems to POP up whenever you want or don't want him to. If that is what makes a great candidate for you, then more power to you. I am happy that you are involved and concerned about the issues facing us today. At this point, no one really knows who the best candidate is. Being human, we will have to take the good while trying to minimize the bad and ugly of politicians. Truly, I have yet to find one that is worth their weight in gold. However, if and when I do find one, I will worship the ground they walk on. I don't think being a politician is an easy job. Honestly, I would bet that it is demanding, exhausting and frustrating. I commend anyone for even attempting to get involved. I just want the best person for the job.

Jeffrey Crane

3:31 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Those are always valid questions. Keep in mind the the same concern could hold true for Ron Sandack as well. These are NOT full-time positions and are not meant to be. Most voters these days look down upon the "career" politician. I guarantee that Debbie Boyle takes these things seriously and if you need some confirmation you can look to her role as the Vice-President of the District 99 School Board. Track her attendance record and involvement in that position. She has the respect and admiration of that board and its President. Since Mayor Sandack never finished his first term as Mayor, you might consider your confidence that he will finish out his term in Springfield. That would be more telling, wouldn't you say?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Jankowski

3:59 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Senator Sandack did complete his term as Mayor -- hardest working person I know.

Comment_arrow

Lee

4:17 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Could you please provide a list of past and present board members who "respect" and "admire" Debbie Boyle that she's worked with?

I can certainly provide the names and contact information of those who do not if you'd like...

As Don points out, Senator Sandack did complete his mayoral term while serving part time in the Senate after his appointment.

Comment_arrow

Eileen Kenah

6:35 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

No those same questions cannot be applied to Ron Sandack because he has shown that he has gone to Springfield and he has read and voted on bills. Going to District 99 Board meetings is probably a 5 minute drive for Debbie Boyle. Springfield is about 200 miles away. I keep beating this to death because DEBBIE herself said she is very busy and has a hectic work schedule. This would not be an issue for me if she did not say that.

PAUL C.

4:32 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Lee,
Thanks and I actually am a nice guy who happens to disagree with Ron Sandack's politcal votes on a variety of issues. I am not a fan of our current block council government. In addition, Ron's alignment with special interest groups and lobbyists are all obvious and can be documented through many sources. I understand that's the game of politics but it doesn't make me have to agree with it. Since I disagree with Ron's positions and motivations in politics, I stand as an opponent and supporter of Debbie Boyle who I feel is more in touch with the type of representation i feel will best serve my interests in Springfield. I am not asking you to come to her side as you would and could never expect me to support Ron. Politics especially in a heated race like this one are filled with facts, drama and research. When it's all over on March 21st morning, we'll all move on with our life's but until then both sides will need to address issues, present facts and win voters. Through it all it is better for the political process that we, the voters have a choice. Now back to war! lol

Reply

UoCDoc

7:58 am on Friday, March 16, 2012

Hey, do you guys like articles about Ron and the Teamsters?

Fresh off the presses at the Illinois Review:

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2012/03/deb-boyle-moon-made-of-green-cheese-sandack-a-teamster.html

Reply

UoCDoc

7:58 am on Friday, March 16, 2012

Here are a few quotes from the link below:

"Ron Sandack is an attorney. Deb: That's a-t-t-o-r-n-e-y. As an -- all together now -- attorney, Ron represents clients. That's c-l-i-e-n-t-s."

"It is important that you got this wrong, because it shows a significant understanding deficit. Not only is Ron not a Teamster, he is on such a panel specifically for his non-Teamster view.

Deb, this means you kind of got this 180 degrees wrong. "

"So, Deb Boyle, on this St Patrick's day eve I have the sad duty to report that, in nursing terms, your assessment skills need a refresher. The patient walked in, you took one look, and you called him a Teamster, when in fact he is an attorney representing job creators."

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2012/03/deb-boyle-moon-made-of-green-cheese-sandack-a-teamster.html

Reply

PAUL C.

8:24 am on Friday, March 16, 2012

IL Lunch Pail Republicans PAC
PO Box 192

Hinsdale, IL 60522 $10,000.00
3/14/2012 Transfer In
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack







1 Votes

From the Illinois Observer, March 3rd , 2012

(Chicago, IL) – Illinois GOP Gets Labor Love, Cash – Formed on February 22 by beer distributor and GOP donor Kevin Burke, president of LaGrange-based Burke Beverage, Inc., to help Republican state legislative candidates friendly to organized labor, the Illinois Lunch Pail Republican PAC got its first check on Friday. Chicagoland Operators Joint Labor-Management PAC kicked in $2,500.

*Not from Chris Robling, insider at the Illinois Review...should be called the "Illinois Cesspool Review"! That's why Chris wants Ron in down there. He'll fit right in to keep the game and the cesspool intact. 45th WORST STATE to start a BUSINESS! HOW WILL RON KEEP BUSINESSES FROM MOVING TO TEXAS AND OTHER STATES IN THE TOP TEN? SAME OLD SAME OLD APPROACH! SIgroups, lobbyists and PAC's all TEAMSTER RON's buddies. ha ha pathetic state we are Chris Robling, who cares about the ILLINOIS CESSPOOL REVIEW. STOP REVIEWING AND BACK CANDIDATES WITH A BACKBONE!

Reply

PAUL C.

5:17 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

Congrats! I'll post the Teamster Ron LETTER again for all the mayor's to see:

http://www.dggab.com/images/forumo/teamsters.pdf

Where's Mayor Tully's endorsement?

Reply

PAUL C.

5:19 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

Perhaps Ron is bullying him for the endorsement! Teamster Ron excels at bullying!
WIN AT ALL COSTS! - The motto of the career politician who once made a decree:
ALL I WANT TO BE IS THE MAYOR OF DOWNERS GROVE....March 26th, 2010 in DgReport. Ironically in Elaine's blog.

Reply

UofCD0C

7:51 pm on Saturday, March 17, 2012

I'm convinced and converted. Debbie Boyle is a saint. Ron Sandack is Satan.

Reply

Paul C..

9:27 pm on Saturday, March 17, 2012

I'm convinced and converted. I have finally pulled my head out of Brian Krajewski's ass and can now breathe and see the day of light. I have finally realized that Brian Krajewski has no social skills and really suffers from a low self esteem. I realize that Brian still harbors bitter feelings from his crushing defeat in 2007. Brian has used others ever since at least 2005 to try and be Mr. Popular in this town. Here is a short list of past BK puppets that I have supported: Peckhart (Dan F.). Falco, Lavoie, Norris, Thoman and Scalzetti. I finally realized that Deb Boyle is just the latest in line to drink the blue kool aid.

Reply

PAUL C.

10:15 pm on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Good one boys! But you forgot to mention Tully Ron! He has more class in his pinky than you have in your entire being! You and Capt C. couldn't BUY him off. At least he has a mind and a will of his own! I saw the exchanges on FB between him and your boy, BB and Martin stood up to the b.s surrounding the coucil power play the 4 blockheads inflicted on Mr. Thoman. I am sure Martin must be asking himself is this all worth it? Many are saying our council is a joke....but aren't laughing! Everyone knows it's BB or Chip Nustad (not sure how to spell this puppet's name) that will be trashing who ever runs against them with Ron's help. How could you leave Council member and Mayor Tully's (irish name) on this special Irish night? I am sure Martin is realizing that DG's block government is a mini-Illinois cesspool. Laugh guys and enjoy because I have enjoyed ripping you all up! If Ron wins this DG Watch Group will be watching your every move! We'll document the votes you'll need to make for ALL your BIG INVESTORS. That nagging website will live on unlike the "SENATOR" title. Rep Ron doesn't sound as POWERFUL! We all know how you love POWER! We have designed a Teamster Ron Bobblehead that we'll sell after the election! Have your followers reserve them with AC....lol

Reply

AC

10:34 pm on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Ron,
I'm ready to join your team as long as I have the Bobblehead account and you accept my $1000.00 contribution from The Illinois Political Bobblehead Committee.
One more request can I please have Lee's position to blog all night?
PLEASE

Reply
Comment_arrow

PAUL C.

11:03 pm on Saturday, March 17, 2012

He'll take it! Just like a vote to increase the city surcharge, Ron would never say no to another PAC donation even if it is a measly gee.

Paul C's Brain

3:49 pm on Sunday, March 18, 2012

Today’s To Do List:
• Blame Ron for global warming.
• Fantasize about Deb Boyle for President.
• Generate more attack ads using false and misleading information.
• Remind self to type in ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME.
• Find out if Teamsters are repairing Ron’s office building. (Note: a new teamster link we can use)
• Blame Ron for the apartheid.
• Start dreaming about Mark Thoman for Mayor.
• Misdirect the public at every possible chance on the Patch.
• Hide the lack of endorsements until Tuesday.
• Call Obama to get Deb an endorsement.
• Sneak out at night and vandalize more Ron signs.
• Use Voodoo doll to keep Deb from saying anything in public.
• Blame Ron for the Bay of Pigs incident.
• Hide Deb from any contact with the media.
• Read Gabber site again and again until I believe it.
• Photoshop picture of Deb and Mother Theresa together reading to the blind.
• Make faces at neighbors when they walk down the sidewalk.
• Romanticize about when Brian was Mayor!
• Spend hours poring over the Patch.
• Repeat in the mirror every morning “I AM A VICTIM”.
I’m just sayin……

Reply

PAUL C.

3:55 pm on Sunday, March 18, 2012

Associated Beer Distributors of Illinois PAC
PO Box 396

Springfield, IL 62705 $5,000.00

Too many at Teamster Ron's hangout today-huh? Emmett's....lol

Reply

PAUL C.

4:12 pm on Sunday, March 18, 2012

http://www.electboyle.com/2012/03/18/just-the-facts/

I think you'll enjoy this little article boys! We are tweeting, emailing, FBooking and texting it all over the district. Is Ron's face getting red?

Reply

UoCDoc

5:08 pm on Sunday, March 18, 2012

OK Morons,

Since you can't seem to figure out even a simple legal document, permit me to help you. (I know I will be accused of being Ron again for talking about a legal document). I don't care any more.

You document shows Ron Sandack and three other Board members as a Plaintiff in those cases.
He was a private pension fund Trustee / Board member in those cases.
The Counsel for the Boards are the Plaintiffs in these suits. Under law are required to list all board members. (basic business knowledge)
The pension board is made up of management trustees like Ron and the others listed)
The pension board is also made up of union trustees, in this case the Teamsters.

When a company stops paying the benefits it owes, the Board's counsel brings a collection case. Hence the documents you people keep pointing at. This happens in nearly every corporate bankruptcy case.

You should at the least, feel embarrassed by this gaff. Any 1st year law student can confirm the information I have stated by simply examining the document you have.

Please, don't take my word for it. Take your document to an attorney and ask him or her to describe the filing to you.

But we all know that you won't do that! You will just continue to pretend that it show's Ron in bed with the IBT. Even after you not know it to be incorrect. At a minimum it shows that you are very dishonest.

What does that say about your candidate's values?

Reply

PAUL C.

7:07 pm on Sunday, March 18, 2012

Here's a new one everyone! Penn National is a racing/casino organization in Penn.
Well, at least it's not from Springfield or Chicago.

Penn National Gaming, Inc.
825 Berkshire Blvd
Wyomissing Professional Center
Wyomissing, PA 19610 $2,500.00
3/17/2012 Individual Contribution
Citizens to Elect Ron Sandack

Reply

PAUL C.

9:38 am on Monday, March 19, 2012

http://www.dggab.com/images/forumo/teamsters.pdf

Here's a fact that Ronnie boy "forgot" to tell the voters about back in March of 2007. It was real TRANSPARENT", He didn't want us all to know the Teamsters were supporting him. It wouldn't have been the way to start the Era of Time for Change.

Reply

Leave a comment